UPSC Mains 2022 · GS Paper II · Q14

UPSC Mains 2022 GS Paper 2 Q14: model answer

Critically examine the procedures through which the Presidents of India and France are elected.

15 marks250 wordsDirective: Examine

What the question wants

Critically examine and compare how India's and France's Presidents are elected.

How to structure it

Critically examine: describe both systems, compare in a table-like set of points, then judge strengths and weaknesses.

  1. India
  2. France
  3. Comparison
  4. Assessment

How to think it through

India elects a constitutional head indirectly; France elects a powerful executive directly. The method fits the role. That is your critical point. India's President never has to kiss babies on a campaign trail; France's must.

Model answer

In July 2022 Droupadi Murmu became President after an indirect vote by about 4,800 MPs and MLAs. In April 2022 Emmanuel Macron was re-elected by about 18.8 million French voters in a direct run-off. Same title, very different routes.

India

  • Article 54: an electoral college of elected MPs and elected MLAs of States, Delhi and Puducherry; nominated members and Legislative Council members excluded.
  • Article 55: proportional representation by single transferable vote, secret ballot.
  • Value of votes: an MLA's vote is weighted by his State's 1971 population; MPs' votes together equal all MLAs' votes. This keeps a balance between the Union and States.
  • Five-year term, eligible for re-election; disputes go to the Supreme Court (Article 71).

France

  • Since a 1962 referendum, direct election by universal suffrage.
  • Two-round system: if no candidate wins an absolute majority, the top two meet in a run-off two weeks later.
  • Candidates need 500 signatures (parrainages) from elected officials across at least 30 departments.
  • Five-year term since the 2000 referendum; maximum two consecutive terms since 2008.
  • The Constitutional Council oversees the vote.

Comparison

  • Mandate: India's President has an indirect mandate, suited to a nominal head; France's President is the real executive, so a popular mandate gives authority.
  • Federal balance: India's college gives States a role; France is unitary.
  • Majority: both need an absolute majority, India through transfers, France through a second round.

Critical assessment

  • India's method avoids a rival power centre to the Prime Minister, but a ruling coalition usually decides the result in advance.
  • France's method gives legitimacy but can produce cohabitation (a President and Prime Minister of opposite camps), as in 1986, 1993 and 1997.

Each system fits its own constitution: India wanted a head of State who symbolises the nation, France a head who governs it.

Draw: A comparison table with rows: who votes, method, majority, term, disputes.

Keywords, cases and data to drop in

Article 54, 55, 71, electoral college, STV, value of votes (1971 population), Droupadi Murmu 2022, France 1962 referendum, two-round system, 500 parrainages, quinquennat 2000, two-term limit 2008, cohabitation.

Where most answers lose marks

  • Saying Indian MLCs vote. Only elected MLAs and MPs do.

Fresh examples from current affairs

GS2 · Governance · Health and Data Privacy

DPDP Act and hospitals: why clinical staff need training before the data law bites

The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules come fully into force in May 2027, and hospitals that mishandle patient data face penalties of up to ₹250 crore. Training doctors and nurses matters more than buying software. For you, this connects Article 21 privacy, the DPDP framework and Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission.

UPSC angle: Prelims: DPDP Act terms, Data Protection Board, Puttaswamy, ABDM. · Mains GS-II: health governance, privacy and digital public infrastructure.

26 Oct 2026
GS2 · Polity · Judiciary

Justice Bhuyan’s remarks on voter deletions: how far can a sitting judge speak, and what is the right to vote?

On October 4, Supreme Court judge Ujjal Bhuyan said a process that strikes millions off the rolls would violate Articles 14 and 326. Former Chief Justice B.R. Gavai objected that a sitting judge should not comment on a pending matter. For you, this connects Article 326, the 1997 judicial code and the Bihar SIR ruling.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Articles 324-326, 61st Amendment, nature of the right to vote, Restatement of 1997. · Mains GS-II: judiciary, judicial accountability and electoral rolls.

26 Oct 2026
GS2 · Polity · Constitutional Bodies

Ex-Governor seeks removal of Kerala PSC chief: what Article 317 actually requires

Former Keralam Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar reportedly asked President Droupadi Murmu to remove Kerala Public Service Commission chairperson M.R. Baiju over alleged irregularities. The Opposition calls it unconstitutional, since Article 317 needs a Supreme Court inquiry first. For you, this connects Articles 315-323, the Governor's role and the independence of recruitment bodies.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Articles 315-317, State PSC tenure, Joint PSC, Governor vs President roles. · Mains GS-II: constitutional bodies; role of the Governor.

26 Oct 2026
GS2 · Polity · Elections

U.P. Chief Electoral Officer orders recheck of voter forms fed by computer operators after SIR errors

Uttar Pradesh's Chief Electoral Officer has ordered reverification of every electoral-roll entry made by computer operators since the post-SIR final rolls of April 10. From now, only booth-level officers may digitise forms, through the BLO App. For you, this connects Forms 6, 7 and 8, Section 32 of the 1950 Act and the Election Commission's machinery.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Forms 6/7/8, Chief Electoral Officer, Section 32 RPA 1950, State Election Commission vs ECI. · Mains GS-II: electoral reforms and integrity of rolls.

26 Oct 2026

Learn the concept

Question text as printed in the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) question paper. The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.

Want every PYQ in one place? See the Battle IAS PYQ Book.