Store
UPSC Mains 2019 · GS Paper IV · Q4b

UPSC Mains 2019 GS Paper 4 Q4b: model answer

There is a view that the Official Secrets Act is an obstacle to the implementation of Right to Information Act. Do you agree with the view? Discuss.

10 marks150 wordsDirective: Discuss

What the question wants

Say whether the Official Secrets Act obstructs the RTI Act, and discuss.

How to structure it

Conflict, legal position, critique, reform.

  1. OSA 1923
  2. RTI's overriding clause
  3. Where friction remains
  4. Reform

How to think it through

OSA 1923 colonial; Section 5 wrongful communication vague. RTI Section 22 overriding effect notwithstanding OSA; Section 8(2): public authority may allow access if public interest outweighs harm to protected interests even if OSA. Section 8(1)(a) security exemption. Friction: culture of secrecy, officers classify freely, Manual of Office Procedure, Rafale documents case 2019 (SC allowed reliance on leaked documents—Yashwant Sinha review 2019); journalists charged. Reform: 2nd ARC 1st report (RTI 2006) recommended repeal of OSA and new provisions in National Security Act; Shourie? Classification review.

Model answer

The Official Secrets Act was written in 1923 to protect a colonial government from its subjects. The RTI Act was written in 2005 to make a democratic government answerable to its citizens. Some friction was inevitable.

The legal position

  • Section 22 of the RTI Act gives it overriding effect over the OSA.
  • Section 8(2) allows disclosure even of information protected by the OSA if public interest outweighs the harm.
  • Genuine secrets remain protected under Section 8(1)(a): security, strategic and economic interests.

Why the view still has some truth

  • Culture of secrecy: officers trained under the OSA tend to deny first and justify later.
  • Over-classification: documents are marked 'secret' without review.
  • In the Rafale review (2019), the government argued that documents published by the press were covered by the OSA; the Supreme Court still allowed them to be examined.

My view

  • Legally, RTI prevails; in practice, the OSA's mindset obstructs it.

Reform

  • The 2nd ARC's first report (2006) recommended repealing the OSA and moving genuine security provisions into a modern law.

A law can lose in court yet win in the officer's mind.

Draw: A tug-of-war: 'OSA 1923: secrecy' vs 'RTI 2005: openness', with Section 22 tipping it towards RTI.

Keywords, cases and data to drop in

Official Secrets Act 1923, RTI Act 2005, Section 22 overriding effect, Section 8(2) public interest override, Section 8(1) (a), culture of secrecy, OSA Section 5 vagueness, over-classification, Rafale review 2019, 2nd ARC first report 2006 repeal, declassification.

Where most answers lose marks

  • Saying OSA legally overrides RTI; the reverse is true.

Fresh examples from current affairs

Main building of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi
GS2 · Polity · Probity

Supreme Court: no prior approval under Section 17A needed to probe a bribe demand

In a judgment of 16 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held that investigating a bribe demand by a public servant does not need prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Asking for a bribe, the court said, is not part of discharging official duties.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Sections 7, 7A, 17A and 19 of the PC Act. · Mains GS-II/GS-IV: honest officers versus accountability.

19 Oct 2026

Learn the concept

ExplainerProbity in Governance (GS-IV): Meaning, Philosophical Basis, Codes of Ethics and Conduct, Citizen’s Charters, RTI and Anti-Corruption Tools (UPSC Ethics Notes + PYQs)ExplainerAttitude (GS-IV): Meaning, ABC Components, Functions, Moral and Political Attitudes, Persuasion and Attitude Change (UPSC Ethics Notes)

Question text as printed in the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) question paper. The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.

Want every PYQ in one place? See the Battle IAS PYQ Book.