UPSC Prelims 2016 · CSAT (Paper II): According to the passage, which one of the following is not a means of…

UPSC Prelims 2016 · CSAT (Paper II)
Read the passage

Accountability, or the lack of it, in governance generally, and civil services, in particular, is a major factor underlying the deficiencies in governance and public administration. Designing an effective framework for accountability has been a key element of the reform agenda. A fundamental issue is whether civil services should be accountable to the political executive of the day or to society at large. In other words, how should internal and external accountability be reconciled ? Internal accountability is sought to be achieved by internal performance monitoring, official supervision by bodies like the Central Vigilance Commission and Comptroller and Auditor General, and judicial review of executive decisions. Articles 311 and 312 of the Indian Constitution provide job security and safeguards to the civil services, especially the All India Services. The framers of the Constitution had envisaged that provision of these safeguards would result in a civil service that is not totally subservient to the political executive but will have the strength to function in larger public interest. The need to balance internal and external accountability is thus built into the Constitution. The issue is where to draw the line. Over the years, the emphasis seems to have tilted in favour of greater internal accountability of the civil services to the political leaders of the day who in turn are expected to be externally accountable to the society at large through the election process. This system for seeking accountability to society has not worked out, and has led to several adverse consequences for governance.
Some special measures can be considered for improving accountability in civil services. Provisions of articles 311 and 312 should be reviewed and laws and regulations framed to ensure external accountability of civil services. The proposed Civil Services Bill seeks to address some of these requirements. The respective roles of professional civil services and the political executive should be defined so that professional managerial functions and management of civil services are depoliticized. For this purpose, effective statutory civil service boards should be created at the centre and in the states. Decentralization and devolution of authority to bring government and decision making closer to the people also helps to enhance accountability.

According to the passage, which one of the following is not a means of enhancing internal accountability of civil services ?

Answer (d) & explanation

People's participation is not a means of internal accountability (d). Step 1: the passage lists the internal means: internal performance monitoring, supervision by bodies like the CVC and CAG, judicial review of executive decisions, and the job safeguards in Articles 311 and 312. Step 2: so options (a), (b) and (c) all appear in the passage as internal means. Step 3: involving people in decisions brings government "closer to the people". That is accountability to society, which is external accountability. So (d) is the odd one out.

Tip: for a "which is NOT" question, tick off every option the passage supports. The one left over is the answer. Read the question word "not" twice.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Related questions from other years

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

Question : X receives three coins of different denominations : 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20. If the total amount received by X is m, does X receive a coin of denomination 5?

Statement I : m is not a prime number.

Statement II : The sum of the digits of m is greater than 5.

Answer (a) & explanation

Statement II alone is enough; Statement I alone is not (a). Step 1: three different coins from 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 give ten totals. With a 5: 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35. Without a 5: 13, 23, 31, 32. Step 2: Statement I (m not prime): 8, 16, 26, 27, 35 have a 5, but 32 (2 + 10 + 20) does not. Mixed answers, so I fails. Step 3: Statement II (digit sum above 5): 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35 qualify, and every one has a 5. (13, 23, 31, 32 have digit sums 4, 5, 4, 5.) So II answers "yes". Options (b), (c) and (d) fail.

Tip: when cases are few, list them all. Then check each statement against the full list.

Trap

don't assume both statements are needed. Listing all ten cases takes thirty seconds and settles it.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)
Read the passage

How is deflation done? Most countries use a method called ‘double deflation’, where input and output prices are deflated separately. Consider a manufacturer importing oil for use in production. If oil prices fall, output prices do not and quantities remain the same, real value added should not change. But if the same deflator is used for inputs and outputs, as in India, it would look as if the manufacturer had become more productive.

Which of the following assumptions is/are valid?

  • 1. Deflation strategies can be used to make manufacturers appear to be doing better than they actually are.
  • 2. When input and output prices are both deflated against a single input price, it is referred to as ‘double deflation’.

Select the answer using the code given below.

Answer (a) & explanation

Only assumption 1 is valid (a). Step 1: the passage says that using one deflator for inputs and outputs, as in India, makes it "look as if the manufacturer had become more productive". So deflation methods can make firms appear better than they are (1). Step 2: assumption 2 says double deflation means deflating both against a single price. But the passage defines double deflation as deflating inputs and outputs separately. So 2 reverses the definition. Step 3: options (b), (c) and (d) fail.

Tip: check definitions word for word against the passage. Deflating means removing the effect of price changes to find real growth, as in real GDP.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

P, Q, R, S and T are ranked 1 to 5 (not necessarily in that order). The rank of P is 4, the rank of Q is not 5, the rank of R is 1, the rank of S is not 2, the rank of T is not 3. Then which of the following is/are correct?

  • I. If the rank of S is 3, then that of T is 2.
  • II. If the rank of Q is 3, then that of T is 5.

Select the answer using the code given below.

Answer (d) & explanation

Neither statement is correct (d). Step 1: P = 4 and R = 1 are fixed. Ranks 2, 3 and 5 remain for Q, S and T, with rules: Q is not 5, S is not 2, T is not 3. Step 2: statement I: if S = 3, then Q and T share 2 and 5. Q cannot be 5, so Q = 2 and T = 5, not 2. I is wrong. Step 3: statement II: if Q = 3, then S and T share 2 and 5. S cannot be 2, so S = 5 and T = 2, not 5. II is wrong. Options (a), (b) and (c) fail.

Tip: fix the known ranks first, then apply each "if" condition and let the "not" rules decide the rest. Write the small table on paper.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

How many times does 5 appear in all two-digit positive integers?

Answer (b) & explanation

The digit 5 appears 19 times (b). Step 1: 5 in the tens place: 50, 51, …, 59 = 10 times. Step 2: 5 in the units place: 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95 = 9 times (05 is not a two-digit number). Step 3: total = 10 + 9 = 19. The number 55 has two 5s, and both are counted. Option (a), 18, counts 55 once. Options (c) and (d) wrongly add 05 or 5.

Tip: count place by place. The question asks how many times the digit appears, not how many numbers contain it (that would be 18).

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →