UPSC Prelims 2015 · CSAT (Paper II): The author says that a thoughtless word hardly ever escapes his tongue or pen.…

UPSC Prelims 2015 · CSAT (Paper II)
Read the passage

I must say that, beyond occasionally exposing me to laughter, my constitutional shyness has been of no disadvantage whatever. In fact I can see that, on the contrary, it has been all to my advantage. My hesitancy in speech, which was once an annoyance, is now a pleasure. Its greatest benefit has been that it has taught me the economy of words. I have naturally formed the habit of restraining my thoughts. And I can now give myself the certificate that a thoughtless word hardly ever escapes my tongue or pen. I do not recollect ever having had to regret anything in my speech or writing. I have thus been spared many a mishap and waste of time. Experience has taught me that silence is part of the spiritual discipline of a votary of truth. Proneness to exaggerate, to suppress or modify the truth, wittingly or unwittingly, is a natural weakness of man, and silence is necessary in order to surmount it. A man of few words will rarely be thoughtless in his speech; he will measure every word. We find so many people impatient to talk. There is no chairman of a meeting who is not pestered with notes for permission to speak. And whenever the permission is given the speaker generally exceeds the time-limit, asks for more time, and keeps on talking without permission. All this talking can hardly be said to be of any benefit to the world. It is so much waste of time. My shyness has been in reality my shield and buckler. It has allowed me to grow. It has helped me in my discernment of truth.

The author says that a thoughtless word hardly ever escapes his tongue or pen. Which one of the following is not a valid reason for this ?

Answer (a) & explanation

Wanting to save time is not a valid reason (a). Step 1: find the reasons the author gives. His hesitancy in speech (d) "taught me the economy of words" (b). "I have naturally formed the habit of restraining my thoughts" (c). These lead to: "a thoughtless word hardly ever escapes my tongue or pen." Step 2: test option (a). The author says he has been spared "waste of time", but that is a result of speaking carefully, not the cause. He never says he speaks carefully because he wants to save time. So (a) is not a valid reason.

Tip: separate causes from results. Linking words like "taught me" show a cause; "thus been spared" shows a result. UPSC often offers a result dressed up as a reason.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Related questions from other years

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

Question : X receives three coins of different denominations : 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20. If the total amount received by X is m, does X receive a coin of denomination 5?

Statement I : m is not a prime number.

Statement II : The sum of the digits of m is greater than 5.

Answer (a) & explanation

Statement II alone is enough; Statement I alone is not (a). Step 1: three different coins from 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 give ten totals. With a 5: 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35. Without a 5: 13, 23, 31, 32. Step 2: Statement I (m not prime): 8, 16, 26, 27, 35 have a 5, but 32 (2 + 10 + 20) does not. Mixed answers, so I fails. Step 3: Statement II (digit sum above 5): 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35 qualify, and every one has a 5. (13, 23, 31, 32 have digit sums 4, 5, 4, 5.) So II answers "yes". Options (b), (c) and (d) fail.

Tip: when cases are few, list them all. Then check each statement against the full list.

Trap

don't assume both statements are needed. Listing all ten cases takes thirty seconds and settles it.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)
Read the passage

How is deflation done? Most countries use a method called ‘double deflation’, where input and output prices are deflated separately. Consider a manufacturer importing oil for use in production. If oil prices fall, output prices do not and quantities remain the same, real value added should not change. But if the same deflator is used for inputs and outputs, as in India, it would look as if the manufacturer had become more productive.

Which of the following assumptions is/are valid?

  • 1. Deflation strategies can be used to make manufacturers appear to be doing better than they actually are.
  • 2. When input and output prices are both deflated against a single input price, it is referred to as ‘double deflation’.

Select the answer using the code given below.

Answer (a) & explanation

Only assumption 1 is valid (a). Step 1: the passage says that using one deflator for inputs and outputs, as in India, makes it "look as if the manufacturer had become more productive". So deflation methods can make firms appear better than they are (1). Step 2: assumption 2 says double deflation means deflating both against a single price. But the passage defines double deflation as deflating inputs and outputs separately. So 2 reverses the definition. Step 3: options (b), (c) and (d) fail.

Tip: check definitions word for word against the passage. Deflating means removing the effect of price changes to find real growth, as in real GDP.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

P, Q, R, S and T are ranked 1 to 5 (not necessarily in that order). The rank of P is 4, the rank of Q is not 5, the rank of R is 1, the rank of S is not 2, the rank of T is not 3. Then which of the following is/are correct?

  • I. If the rank of S is 3, then that of T is 2.
  • II. If the rank of Q is 3, then that of T is 5.

Select the answer using the code given below.

Answer (d) & explanation

Neither statement is correct (d). Step 1: P = 4 and R = 1 are fixed. Ranks 2, 3 and 5 remain for Q, S and T, with rules: Q is not 5, S is not 2, T is not 3. Step 2: statement I: if S = 3, then Q and T share 2 and 5. Q cannot be 5, so Q = 2 and T = 5, not 2. I is wrong. Step 3: statement II: if Q = 3, then S and T share 2 and 5. S cannot be 2, so S = 5 and T = 2, not 5. II is wrong. Options (a), (b) and (c) fail.

Tip: fix the known ranks first, then apply each "if" condition and let the "not" rules decide the rest. Write the small table on paper.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

How many times does 5 appear in all two-digit positive integers?

Answer (b) & explanation

The digit 5 appears 19 times (b). Step 1: 5 in the tens place: 50, 51, …, 59 = 10 times. Step 2: 5 in the units place: 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95 = 9 times (05 is not a two-digit number). Step 3: total = 10 + 9 = 19. The number 55 has two 5s, and both are counted. Option (a), 18, counts 55 once. Options (c) and (d) wrongly add 05 or 5.

Tip: count place by place. The question asks how many times the digit appears, not how many numbers contain it (that would be 18).

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →