UPSC Mains 2017 · GS Paper IV · Q13

UPSC Mains 2017 GS Paper 4 Q13: model answer

A building permitted for three floors, while being extended illegally to 6 floors by a builder, collapses. As a consequence, a number of innocent labourers including women and children died. These labourers are migrants of different places. The government immediately announced cash relief to the aggrieved families and arrested the builder. Give reasons for such incidents taking place across the country. Suggest measures to prevent their occurrence.

20 marks250 wordsDirective: Suggest

What the question wants

Give reasons why illegal building collapses happen across India and suggest preventive measures.

How to structure it

Reasons, measures.

  1. Why
  2. Prevention

How to think it through

Reasons: builder-official-politician nexus; weak enforcement; corruption in sanction; regularisation schemes (amnesty creates expectation); urban housing shortage; low-quality materials; poor inspection staff; migrant labour invisible, no registration (BOCW Act 1996 boards underused); slow courts; post-disaster relief culture. Examples: Moulivakkam Chennai 2014 (61 died), Bhiwandi 2020, Thane Mumbra 2013. Measures: online building approvals + geotagged inspections, third-party structural audits, mandatory registration with RERA, accountability of officials, no regularisation of unsafe floors, worker registration and safety under BOCW and OSH Code 2020, insurance, citizen reporting apps, drone surveys, fast-track prosecution.

Model answer

Stakeholders

  • Dead and injured labourers and their families; future residents; the builder; municipal officials; the government.

Dilemmas

  • Housing demand and growth vs safety; relief after deaths vs prevention before.

Options

  • Relief and arrests only; blanket demolitions; systemic prevention with accountability.

Cash relief and one arrest are the usual script after a collapse. The script is repeated because the system that allowed three extra floors is never put in the dock.

Why such incidents happen

  • Nexus: builders, local officials and politicians gain from illegal floors.
  • Weak enforcement: too few inspectors, and inspections done on paper.
  • Regularisation schemes: repeated amnesties tell builders that illegal floors will be legalised later.
  • Housing shortage: demand for cheap housing makes illegal buildings profitable.
  • Poor materials and design, with no structural audit.
  • Invisible workers: migrant labourers are often unregistered under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act, 1996, so their safety is nobody's business.
  • Slow justice: cases drag on, penalties are rarely applied to officials. Moulivakkam, Chennai (2014), where 61 people died, showed how long accountability takes.

Measures to prevent them

  • Transparent approvals: online sanctions, with plans and permitted floors displayed publicly at the site.
  • Geotagged inspections at fixed stages, with photographs uploaded; drone surveys for unauthorised floors.
  • Third-party structural audits before occupancy and for old buildings.
  • Accountability of officials: if an illegal floor comes up in an inspector's area, he answers for it.
  • No regularisation of structurally unsafe construction.
  • Worker safety: compulsory registration of workers, safety gear and insurance under the OSH Code, 2020; the builder liable for compensation.
  • Citizen reporting: an app to report illegal construction, with protection for the person reporting.
  • RERA registration and fast-track courts for building violations.
  • Relief that reaches migrants: compensation that can be claimed from the worker's home State, without a local address or bank account.

The labourers who died had no say in the extra floors. Prevention means giving them, and the city, someone who answers before the concrete sets.

Draw: A building with three permitted floors in blue and three illegal ones in red, with arrows to 'nexus, weak inspection, amnesty'.

Keywords, cases and data to drop in

illegal construction, builder-official nexus, regularisation schemes, Moulivakkam 2014, BOCW Act 1996, OSH Code 2020, geotagged inspections, drones, structural audit, official accountability, RERA, citizen reporting, fast-track courts.

Where most answers lose marks

  • Writing only 'strict punishment for builders' and ignoring official accountability and worker safety.

Fresh examples from current affairs

Main building of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi
GS2 · Polity · Probity

Supreme Court: no prior approval under Section 17A needed to probe a bribe demand

In a judgment of 16 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held that investigating a bribe demand by a public servant does not need prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Asking for a bribe, the court said, is not part of discharging official duties.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Sections 7, 7A, 17A and 19 of the PC Act. · Mains GS-II/GS-IV: honest officers versus accountability.

19 Oct 2026

Learn the concept

Question text as printed in the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) question paper. The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.

Want every PYQ in one place? See the Battle IAS PYQ Book.