UPSC Mains 2022 · GS Paper IV · Q7

UPSC Mains 2022 GS Paper 4 Q7: model answer

Prabhat was working as Vice President (Marketing) at Sterling Electric Ltd., a reputed multinational company. But presently the company was passing through the difficult times as the sales were continuously showing downward trend in the last two quarters. His division, which hitherto had been a major revenue contributor to the company's financial health, was now desperately trying to procure some big government order for them. But their best efforts did not yield any positive success or breakthrough. His was a professional company and his local bosses were under pressure from their London-based HO to show some positive results. In the last performance review meeting taken by the Executive Director (India Head), he was reprimanded for his poor performance. He assured them that his division is working on a special contract from the Ministry of Defence for a secret installation near Gwalior and tender is being submitted shortly. He was under extreme pressure and he was deeply perturbed. What aggravated the situation further was a warning from the top that if the deal is not clinched in favour of the company, his division might have to be closed and he may have to quit his lucrative job. There was another dimension which was causing him deep mental torture and agony. This pertained to his personal precarious financial health. He was a single earner in the family with two school-college going children and his old ailing mother. The heavy expenditure on education and medical was causing a big strain to his monthly pay packet. Regular EMI for housing loan taken from bank was unavoidable and any default would render him liable for severe legal action. In the above backdrop, he was hoping for some miracle to happen. There was sudden turn of events. His secretary informed that a gentleman—Subhash Verma wanted to see him as he was interested in the position of Manager which was to be filled in by him in the company. He further brought to his notice that his CV has been received through the office of the Minister of Defence. During interview of the candidate—Subhash Verma, he found him technically sound, resourceful and experienced marketeer. He seemed to be well-conversant with tendering procedures and having knack of follow-up and liaising in this regard. Prabhat felt that he was better choice than the rest of the candidates who were recently interviewed by him in the last few days. Subhash Verma also indicated that he was in possession of the copies of the bid documents that the Unique Electronics Ltd. would be submitting the next day to the Defence Ministry for their tender. He offered to hand over those documents subject to his employment in the company on suitable terms and conditions. He made it clear that in the process, the Sterling Electric Ltd. could outbid their rival company and get the bid and hefty Defence Ministry order. He indicated that it will be win-win situation for both—him and the company. Prabhat was absolutely stunned. It was a mixed feeling of shock and thrill. He was uncomfortable and perspiring. If accepted, all his problems would vanish instantly and he may be rewarded for securing the much awaited tender and thereby boosting company's sales and financial health. He was in a fix as to the future course of action. He was wonder-struck at the guts of Subhash Verma in having surreptitiously removing his own company papers and offering to the rival company for a job. Being an experienced person, he was examining the pros and cons of the proposal/situation and he asked him to come the next day. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Prabhat in the above situation. be the|most appropriate for Prabhat and why? www.unlockias.in/upsc-mains-pyq/gs-paper-4

20 marks250 wordsDirective: Examine

What the question wants

Discuss the ethical issues when a candidate offers a rival's bid documents in exchange for a job, examine Prabhat's options and choose the most appropriate.

How to structure it

Issues, options, choice.

(a) Ethical issues

(b) Options

(c) Best option

How to think it through

Issues: theft of confidential documents (corporate espionage), unfair competition, defence procurement integrity (national security - secret installation), CV via Minister's office (influence peddling), personal financial pressure, career threat, loyalty to company; Official Secrets Act could apply to defence tender info. Options: accept documents and hire; hire without documents; reject candidate and stay silent; reject, inform company's legal/compliance and the rival/Ministry; Best: refuse docs, don't hire (integrity red flag, he betrayed his employer), inform compliance and legal; consider informing Defence Ministry since a defence tender's integrity is compromised; compete on merit; separately, address personal finances (talk to bank, restructure EMI).

Model answer

Stakeholders

  • Prabhat and his family; Sterling Electric and its London HO; Unique Electronics; the Ministry of Defence; Subhash Verma; honest bidders; national security.

Dilemmas

  • Personal and company survival vs integrity; temptation vs law; loyalty to employer vs fair competition.

Options

  • Take documents and hire him; hire him without documents; reject quietly; reject and report.

Subhash Verma is offering a shortcut, and he has just shown how he treats employers: he steals from them.

(a) Ethical issues

  • Theft and corporate espionage: using a rival's stolen bid documents is unethical and unlawful.
  • Integrity of defence procurement: the tender concerns a secret installation; leaked bids corrupt a process linked to national security.
  • Influence peddling: a CV routed through a Minister's office suggests pressure to hire.
  • Personal pressure: debts, EMIs and an ailing mother make temptation stronger, but they do not change right and wrong.
  • Conflict between results and means: the company wants results; the question is at what cost.

(b) Options

  • Accept the documents and hire him: may win the tender and save his job. But it is fraud; if discovered, the company may be blacklisted from defence contracts, face prosecution and lose its global reputation. Prabhat could lose not just his job but his career.
  • Hire him but refuse the documents: avoids the immediate wrong, but brings in a person of proven dishonesty and political links.
  • Reject him and stay silent: keeps Prabhat clean, but a stolen bid is still in circulation and may go to another rival.
  • Reject the offer and report it to the company's compliance and legal team, and, through them, to the Ministry of Defence.

(c) Most appropriate option: the last one

  • Refuse the documents and do not hire Verma.
  • Report to compliance the same day; let the company decide on informing the Ministry, which it should, since the tender's fairness is at stake.
  • Win on merit: sharpen the bid on price, quality and service.
  • Handle personal finances separately: talk to the bank about restructuring his loan.

Some miracles are traps in disguise. The only win worth having is one that survives an audit.

Draw: A decision tree: 'accept' → short gain → exposure → blacklisting; 'refuse and report' → fair bid → lasting reputation.

Keywords, cases and data to drop in

corporate espionage, stolen bid documents, defence procurement integrity, national security, influence peddling, compliance, blacklisting risk, Official Secrets Act, fair competition, financial pressure, means and ends, merit-based bid.

Where most answers lose marks

  • Recommending hiring Verma 'for his skills' while ignoring that he has already proved dishonest.

Fresh examples from current affairs

Main building of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi
GS2 · Polity · Probity

Supreme Court: no prior approval under Section 17A needed to probe a bribe demand

In a judgment of 16 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held that investigating a bribe demand by a public servant does not need prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Asking for a bribe, the court said, is not part of discharging official duties.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Sections 7, 7A, 17A and 19 of the PC Act. · Mains GS-II/GS-IV: honest officers versus accountability.

19 Oct 2026

Learn the concept

Question text as printed in the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) question paper. The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.

Want every PYQ in one place? See the Battle IAS PYQ Book.