UPSC Mains 2024 · GS Paper IV · Q11

UPSC Mains 2024 GS4 Q11: model answer

With the summer heat being exceptionally severe this year, the district has been facing severe water shortage. The District Collector has been mobilizing his subordinate officials to conserve the remaining water reserves for preventing the district from plunging into acute drinking water crisis. Along with an awareness campaign for conserving water, strict measures have been taken for stopping the over-exploitation of ground-water. Vigilance teams have been deployed to tour the villages and find the farmers who are drawing water from deep borewells or from the river reservoir for irrigation. The farmers are agitated by such action. A delegation of farmers meets the District Collector with their issues and complains that while they are not being allowed to irrigate their crops, big industries located near the river are drawing huge amounts of water through deep borewells for their industrial processes. The farmers allege that their administration is anti-farmer and corrupt, being bribed by the industry. The district needs to placate the farmers as they are threatening to go on a prolonged protest. At the same time, the District Collector has to deal with the water crisis. The industry cannot be closed as this would result in a large number of workers being unemployed.
(a) Discuss all options available to the District Collector as a District Magistrate.
(b) What suitable actions can be taken in view of mutually compatible interests of the stakeholders?
(c) What are the potential administrative and ethical dilemmas for the District Collector?

20 marks250 wordsDirective: Case study

What the question wants

Collector's options and balanced actions in a water crisis pitting farmers against industry.

How to structure it

Intro: competing needs (drinking, farming, industry). Body: (a) options as District Magistrate: status quo, close industry, equal rationing with audit; (b) mutually compatible actions: water audit, priority order, treated water for industry, crop support; (c) administrative and ethical dilemmas. Conclusion: fairness visible to all.

How to structure the answer
IntroductionCompeting needs (drinking, farming, industry)
Main body
  1. 1(a) options as District Magistrate: status quo,
ConclusionIndustry, equal rationing with audit; (b) mutually compatible actions: water audit, priority order, treated water for industry, crop support; (c) administrative and ethical dilemmas. Conclusion: fairness visible to all

Model answer

Drinking water must come first, but farmers feel singled out while industries draw groundwater. Perceived unfairness is fuelling anger.

Fair water sharing in a drought
District water plandrinking water first
  • Audit and meter industrial borewells
  • Seal illegal extraction
  • Recycled water for industry
  • Limited irrigation slots
  • Compensation and crop support
  • Open data and regular meetings

(a) Options

  1. Continue action only against farmers: legally possible, but unfair and inflammatory.
  2. Shut industries: pleases farmers but causes job losses.
  3. Apply restrictions to all users in proportion, verify industrial extraction, and engage farmers: fair and workable.

As District Magistrate, he can use powers under Section 163 BNSS (formerly Section 144 CrPC) and State groundwater laws, along with CGWA permits for industry.

(b) Mutually compatible actions

  • Joint inspection of industrial borewells with farmer representatives; seal illegal ones; meter all extraction.
  • Priority order as per the National Water Policy: drinking water, then irrigation, then industry.
  • Industries to cut use, recycle water and use treated sewage; tankers for villages funded through CSR.
  • Limited irrigation slots for standing crops; crop insurance and compensation for losses.
  • Promote drip irrigation and short-duration crops; desilt tanks before monsoon.
  • Regular meetings and public data on water use to rebuild trust.
  • Probe the bribery allegation through vigilance.

(c) Dilemmas

  • Livelihood of farmers vs jobs of workers.
  • Equity vs economic growth.
  • Firm enforcement vs keeping peace.
  • Protecting the administration's reputation vs honestly investigating its own staff.

When restrictions are fair and visible, cooperation replaces protest.

Keywords, cases and data to drop in

water audit priority of drinking water CGWA equity participatory governance

Where most answers lose marks

  • Closing industry outright.
  • Ignoring the corruption allegation.

Fresh examples from current affairs

GS2/GS3 · Consumer protection · Internal security

CCPA acts against online sale of explosives: 3,940 sellers delisted from seven platforms

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) said on 19 October 2026 that 3,940 sellers of regulated explosives such as ammonium nitrate, picric acid and PETN have been delisted from seven online platforms after its action. It has fined Dial4Trade and ExportersIndia ₹10 lakh per order, and other cases are under hearing or investigation.

UPSC angle: Prelims: CCPA, PESO, CPA 2019 sections, helpline 1915. · Mains GS-II/III: platform liability and security.

19 Oct 2026
GS2/GS3 · Consumer protection · Trade

India to host 61st CIML meeting on legal metrology in New Delhi, 26–28 October

India will host the 61st meeting of the International Committee of Legal Metrology (CIML) for the first time, in New Delhi from 26 to 28 October 2026. The Department of Consumer Affairs is organising it with the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML), and more than 100 delegates are expected, PIB said on 19 October.

UPSC angle: Prelims: OIML, CIML, Legal Metrology Act 2009, Union List Entry 50. · Mains GS-III: standards and trade.

19 Oct 2026
GS2 · Health · Education

NMC withdraws MSMER-2023: medical colleges lose the fixed penalty rulebook, annual disclosure stays

The National Medical Commission (NMC) has de-notified the Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (MSMER-2023) by a notification dated 14 October 2026, published in the Gazette on 16 October. Its fixed penalties, including seat cuts and fines of up to ₹5 lakh for false records, go with it. The Annual Disclosure Report stays.

UPSC angle: Prelims: NMC Act 2019, autonomous boards, Concurrent List Entry 25. · Mains GS-II: regulation of medical education.

19 Oct 2026
GS2 · Polity · Probity

Supreme Court: no prior approval under Section 17A needed to probe a bribe demand

In a judgment of 16 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held that investigating a bribe demand by a public servant does not need prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Asking for a bribe, the court said, is not part of discharging official duties.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Sections 7, 7A, 17A and 19 of the PC Act. · Mains GS-II/GS-IV: honest officers versus accountability.

19 Oct 2026

Learn the concept

Question text as printed in the official UPSC question paper: https://www.upsc.gov.in/sites/default/files/QP_CSM_2024_GenStud_IV_03102024.pdf The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.