UPSC Prelims 2014 · CSAT (Paper II): The author’s central focus is on

UPSC Prelims 2014 · CSAT (Paper II)
Read the passage

In recent times, India has grown fast not only compared to its own past but also in comparison with other nations. But there cannot be any room for complacency because it is possible for the Indian economy to develop even faster and also to spread the benefits of this growth more widely than has been done thus far. Before going into details of the kinds of micro-structural changes that we need to conceptualize and then proceed to implement, it is worthwhile elaborating on the idea of inclusive growth that constitutes the defining concept behind this Government’s various economic policies and decisions. A nation interested in inclusive growth views the same growth differently depending on whether the gains of the growth are heaped primarily on a small segment or shared widely by the population. The latter is cause for celebration but not the former. In other words, growth must not be treated as an end in itself but as an instrument for spreading prosperity to all. India’s own past experience and the experience of other nations suggests that growth is necessary for eradicating poverty but it is not a sufficient condition. In other words, policies for promoting growth need to be complemented with policies to ensure that more and more people join in the growth process and, further, that there are mechanisms in place to redistribute some of the gains to those who are unable to partake in the market process and, hence, get left behind.
A simple way of giving this idea of inclusive growth a sharper form is to measure a nation’s progress in terms of the progress of its poorest segment, for instance the bottom 20 per cent of the population. One could measure the per capita income of the bottom quintile of the population and also calculate the growth rate of income; and evaluate our economic success in terms of these measures that pertain to the poorest segment. This approach is attractive because it does not ignore growth like some of the older heterodox criteria did. It simply looks at the growth of income of the poorest sections of the population. It also ensures that those who are outside of the bottom quintile do not get ignored. If that were done, then those people would in all likelihood drop down into the bottom quintile and so would automatically become a direct target of our policies. Hence the criterion being suggested here is a statistical summing up of the idea of inclusive growth, which, in turn, leads to two corollaries : to wish that India must strive to achieve high growth and that we must work to ensure that the weakest segments benefit from the growth.

The author’s central focus is on

Answer (c) & explanation

The central focus is inclusive growth (c). Step 1: find the key phrase. The author calls inclusive growth "the defining concept" behind policy, and says growth should be judged by whether its gains are "shared widely by the population". Step 2: test the other options. Option (a) is wrong: India's fast growth is mentioned only in the opening line, and the author then says there is "no room for complacency". Option (b) is wrong: the passage says growth is "not a sufficient condition", so it cannot be the "sole determinant". Option (d) is wrong: high growth is only half the idea; the other half is spreading its benefits.

Tip: the central focus is usually the idea the author defines and keeps returning to, not the first fact mentioned.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Same theme in UPSC Mains

Related questions from other years

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

Question : X receives three coins of different denominations : 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20. If the total amount received by X is m, does X receive a coin of denomination 5?

Statement I : m is not a prime number.

Statement II : The sum of the digits of m is greater than 5.

Answer (a) & explanation

Statement II alone is enough; Statement I alone is not (a). Step 1: three different coins from 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 give ten totals. With a 5: 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35. Without a 5: 13, 23, 31, 32. Step 2: Statement I (m not prime): 8, 16, 26, 27, 35 have a 5, but 32 (2 + 10 + 20) does not. Mixed answers, so I fails. Step 3: Statement II (digit sum above 5): 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35 qualify, and every one has a 5. (13, 23, 31, 32 have digit sums 4, 5, 4, 5.) So II answers "yes". Options (b), (c) and (d) fail.

Tip: when cases are few, list them all. Then check each statement against the full list.

Trap

don't assume both statements are needed. Listing all ten cases takes thirty seconds and settles it.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)
Read the passage

How is deflation done? Most countries use a method called ‘double deflation’, where input and output prices are deflated separately. Consider a manufacturer importing oil for use in production. If oil prices fall, output prices do not and quantities remain the same, real value added should not change. But if the same deflator is used for inputs and outputs, as in India, it would look as if the manufacturer had become more productive.

Which of the following assumptions is/are valid?

  • 1. Deflation strategies can be used to make manufacturers appear to be doing better than they actually are.
  • 2. When input and output prices are both deflated against a single input price, it is referred to as ‘double deflation’.

Select the answer using the code given below.

Answer (a) & explanation

Only assumption 1 is valid (a). Step 1: the passage says that using one deflator for inputs and outputs, as in India, makes it "look as if the manufacturer had become more productive". So deflation methods can make firms appear better than they are (1). Step 2: assumption 2 says double deflation means deflating both against a single price. But the passage defines double deflation as deflating inputs and outputs separately. So 2 reverses the definition. Step 3: options (b), (c) and (d) fail.

Tip: check definitions word for word against the passage. Deflating means removing the effect of price changes to find real growth, as in real GDP.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

P, Q, R, S and T are ranked 1 to 5 (not necessarily in that order). The rank of P is 4, the rank of Q is not 5, the rank of R is 1, the rank of S is not 2, the rank of T is not 3. Then which of the following is/are correct?

  • I. If the rank of S is 3, then that of T is 2.
  • II. If the rank of Q is 3, then that of T is 5.

Select the answer using the code given below.

Answer (d) & explanation

Neither statement is correct (d). Step 1: P = 4 and R = 1 are fixed. Ranks 2, 3 and 5 remain for Q, S and T, with rules: Q is not 5, S is not 2, T is not 3. Step 2: statement I: if S = 3, then Q and T share 2 and 5. Q cannot be 5, so Q = 2 and T = 5, not 2. I is wrong. Step 3: statement II: if Q = 3, then S and T share 2 and 5. S cannot be 2, so S = 5 and T = 2, not 5. II is wrong. Options (a), (b) and (c) fail.

Tip: fix the known ranks first, then apply each "if" condition and let the "not" rules decide the rest. Write the small table on paper.

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →

UPSC Prelims 2026 · CSAT (Paper II)

How many times does 5 appear in all two-digit positive integers?

Answer (b) & explanation

The digit 5 appears 19 times (b). Step 1: 5 in the tens place: 50, 51, …, 59 = 10 times. Step 2: 5 in the units place: 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, 95 = 9 times (05 is not a two-digit number). Step 3: total = 10 + 9 = 19. The number 55 has two 5s, and both are counted. Option (a), 18, counts 55 once. Options (c) and (d) wrongly add 05 or 5.

Tip: count place by place. The question asks how many times the digit appears, not how many numbers contain it (that would be 18).

Answer as per the official UPSC answer key.

Open this question's page →