UPSC Mains 2016 GS Paper 3 Q17: model answer
The terms ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’ are often used in connection with armed action against terrorist attacks. Discuss the strategic impact of such actions.
What the question wants
Explain hot pursuit and surgical strikes and discuss their strategic impact on terrorism and on India's security posture.
How to structure it
Define, examples, impact.
- Meaning
- Indian examples
- Positive strategic impact
- Risks
- Balance
How to think it through
Hot pursuit: chasing across border immediately; surgical strike: precise limited strike on specific targets. Examples: June 2015 Myanmar (after Chandel ambush 18 soldiers), Sept 29 2016 after Uri (19 soldiers), Balakot 26 Feb 2019 after Pulwama (40 CRPF), Op Sindoor May 2025 after Pahalgam. Impact: deterrence, new red lines, morale, domestic support, signals end of strategic restraint. Risks: escalation between nuclear states, international law (Art 51 self-defence), dependence on intelligence, adversary adaption.
Model answer
On the night of 29 September 2016, eleven days after terrorists killed 19 soldiers at Uri, Indian special forces crossed the Line of Control and hit launch pads. For the first time, India said so publicly. That announcement mattered as much as the strike.
The terms
- Hot pursuit: chasing militants across a border immediately after an attack, as in the June 2015 operation in Myanmar after the Chandel ambush.
- Surgical strike: a quick, precise, limited strike on specific targets, avoiding civilian harm.
Strategic impact
- Deterrence: it raises the cost of cross-border terror for the sponsor.
- New red lines: Balakot (2019, after Pulwama) and Operation Sindoor (May 2025, after Pahalgam) built on 2016 and showed that a major attack will draw a military answer.
- End of 'strategic restraint': India's posture moved from complaint to response.
- Morale of forces and public confidence rose.
- Diplomatic signal: India framed strikes as self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter, targeting terrorists, not the state.
Risks and limits
- Escalation between nuclear-armed neighbours.
- Strikes depend on precise intelligence; failure is costly.
- Adversaries adapt by dispersing camps and using drones.
- Strikes do not fix local radicalisation.
The balance
Strikes work as a punishment tool within a wider strategy of border denial, diplomacy, terror-finance pressure and better policing.
A strike can change an adversary's calculations; only governance changes a valley's mood.
Draw: An escalation ladder from diplomatic protest to surgical strike to air strike, with India's examples on each rung.
Keywords, cases and data to drop in
hot pursuit, surgical strike, Chandel ambush 2015, Uri 2016, Balakot 2019, Pulwama, Operation Sindoor 2025, Pahalgam, deterrence, Article 51, escalation ladder, strategic restraint.
Where most answers lose marks
- Celebrating the strikes without weighing escalation and legal risks.
Related Mains PYQs
- Discuss how national security can be balanced with concerns of human rights. UPSC 2026 · GS-IV
- Rajapuram is a border district. Jhara and Biru, its two major communities are in continual conflict with each other. The social fabric… UPSC 2026 · GS-IV
- Keeping the national security in mind, examine the ethical dilemmas related to controversies over environmental clearance of development projects in ecologically sensitive… UPSC 2025 · GS-IV
- Raman is a senior IPS officer and has recently been posted as D.G. of a state. Among the various issues and problems/challenges… UPSC 2024 · GS-IV
Fresh examples from current affairs
Vehicle data sold for ₹5: Centre orders CERT-In audit of VAHAN, SARATHI and e-Challan portals
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways has asked CERT-In, India’s cyber-security agency, for a forensic audit of its VAHAN, SARATHI, e-Challan and pollution-certificate portals. A security firm found that owners’ names, addresses and phone numbers were being sold through apps and a Telegram channel for as little as ₹5. On the same day, The Hindu reported a separate leak of film certification records. For you, this connects cyber security, the right to privacy and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
UPSC angle: Prelims: CERT-In, Section 70B IT Act, VAHAN/SARATHI, Puttaswamy, DPDP Act 2023, GDPR. · Mains GS-III: cyber security and data protection.
25 Oct 2026
Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan reaches 35 crore people: demand reduction and the 2029 drug-free goal
The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment said on 22 October 2026 that the Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan has reached over 35 crore people, including 13.94 crore youth and 10.86 crore women, and more than 32 lakh educational institutions. Launched on 15 August 2020 in 272 vulnerable districts, it now runs across the country. It is the demand side of a twin strategy, while police and the NCB attack supply, with the Home Minister’s target of uprooting the drug trade by 31 December 2029.
UPSC angle: Prelims: NMBA, NAPDDR, Article 47, NDPS Act, helpline 14446. · Mains GS-II/III: drug abuse, demand and supply reduction.
23 Oct 2026
Prasar Bharati at 29: why India’s public broadcaster still lacks the autonomy its law promised
A lead article in The Hindu on 23 October 2026 argues that Prasar Bharati, set up to be a free public broadcaster, still works like a government department. The Prasar Bharati Act of 1990 came into force only in 1997, and its key safeguards, a parliamentary committee (Section 13) and a Broadcasting Council for complaints (Sections 14–15), were never set up, while Section 23 still lets the Centre give binding directions. For you, this is a neat case study of a law that promises autonomy but never builds the institutions that make it real.
UPSC angle: Prelims: Prasar Bharati Act 1990, Sections 13–15 and 23, Cricket Association of Bengal (1995). · Mains GS-II: autonomy of statutory bodies; media and democracy.
23 Oct 2026
Face-off with China continues in Arunachal: ITBP chief confirms stand-off at Asaphila
ITBP Director General Shatrujeet Kapur said on 22 October 2026 that face-offs with Chinese troops are continuing at several places along the Arunachal Pradesh border. It is the first official confirmation of the scale of tension since July, when Chinese troops pitched tents 6–7 km inside India’s perception of the Line of Actual Control near Asaphila in Upper Subansiri. Three rounds of high-level talks have not ended it, so the ITBP is betting on drones and underground shelters.
UPSC angle: Prelims: McMahon Line, WMCC, SR talks, ITBP, Upper Subansiri. · Mains GS-III: border management; GS-II: India–China.
23 Oct 2026Learn the concept
Question text as printed in the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) question paper. The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.
Want every PYQ in one place? See the Battle IAS PYQ Book.