Chapter 1 · Topic 1.1 · Prelims + Mains1 of 3

Basics of Indian Foreign Policy: Principles and evolution

Key points

  • Article 51, Panchsheel, non-alignment.
  • Look East and Gujral doctrine.

Prelims box: facts and traps

PhaseMain idea
1947-1962Non-alignment, Panchsheel
1962-1991Security and realism
1991 onwardEconomy first, Look East
2014 onwardAct East, Neighbourhood First, SAGAR.
  • India’s starting point is Article 51 (a Directive Principle): “The State shall endeavour to— (a) promote international peace and security; (b) maintain just and honourable relations between nations; (c) foster respect for international law and treaty obligations…; and (d) encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration.”
  • Panchsheel, the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence, were first formally set out in the India-China Agreement on Trade and Intercourse with the Tibet region, signed on 29 April 1954.
  • After the April 1954 agreement, Nehru and Zhou Enlai issued the India-China Joint Statement in New Delhi on 28 June 1954, extending the principles beyond the Tibet trade context.
  • Trap (UPSC Prelims 2011, “Look East Policy” of India): “India wants to plug the vacuum created by the termination of Cold War” is incorrect.
  • Trap: “Phase two of India's Look East policy was first outlined by Prime Minister I.K. Gujral in 1996” is wrong. The idea of a second phase was set out by External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha in a speech at Harvard University in September 2003, as studies by ISAS (NUS) and others record.

Principles: Article 51, Panchsheel and non-alignment

Foreign policy is how a country pursues its national interest abroad: security, development, status and values. India’s starting point is Article 51 (a Directive Principle): “The State shall endeavour to— (a) promote international peace and security; (b) maintain just and honourable relations between nations; (c) foster respect for international law and treaty obligations…; and (d) encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration.” Article 253 lets Parliament make laws to implement any treaty or international agreement.

Panchsheel, the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence, were first formally set out in the India-China Agreement on Trade and Intercourse with the Tibet region, signed on 29 April 1954: mutual respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty, mutual non-aggression, mutual non-interference, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful co-existence (MEA). They entered the Bandung Declaration (April 1955, 29 Afro-Asian countries), a UN General Assembly resolution (14 December 1957), and the 1961 Belgrade Conference of Non-Aligned Nations took them as the core of non-alignment (MEA).

Non-alignment meant not joining either Cold War bloc, judging each issue on merit, and keeping freedom of decision. It was not neutrality: India took clear positions on colonialism and apartheid.

Mains 2019: “The long-sustained image of India as a leader of the oppressed and marginalised nations has disappeared on account of its newfound role in the emerging global order.” Elaborate. For: closer ties with the US, Quad and G7 outreach, and focus on national interest. Against: India still speaks for the Global South (vaccine supplies abroad during Covid-19, demands for climate finance). Better view: the image has changed form, from ideological leadership to a bridge between North and South.

Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2019 · GS Paper II · Q19 · 15 marks

“The long-sustained image of India as a leader of the oppressed and marginalised nations has disappeared on account of its new found role in the emerging global order.” Elaborate.

Evolution: Look East, Gujral doctrine and after

PhaseMain ideaExample
1947-1962Non-alignment, PanchsheelBandung, NAM
1962-1991Security and realism1971 Indo-Soviet treaty
1991 onwardEconomy first, Look EastTies with ASEAN, US, Israel
2014 onwardAct East, Neighbourhood First, SAGARMulti-alignment

Prelims 2011, with reference to “Look East Policy” of India: India wants to establish itself as an important regional player in the East Asian affairs (correct) and to restore historical and cultural ties with Southeast and East Asia (correct); plugging a vacuum left by the Cold War was not its aim. Answer (b): 1 and 3 only.

Asked by UPSCUPSC Prelims 2011 · GS Paper I · Q42

With reference to “Look East Policy” of India, consider the following statements : 1. India wants to establish itself as an important regional player in the East Asian affairs. 2. India wants to plug the vacuum created by the termination of Cold War. 3. India wants to restore the historical and cultural ties with its neighbours in Southeast and East Asia. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

  1. 1 only
  2. 1 and 3 only
  3. 3 only
  4. 1, 2 and 3
Show answer

Answer: (b) · UPSC official key

Mains 2016 asked candidates to evaluate the economic and strategic dimensions of India’s Look East Policy in the context of the post-Cold War international scenario. Economic: trade and investment with ASEAN, free trade agreements, connectivity to the North-East. Strategic: balancing China, maritime security in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea, defence ties with Vietnam, Japan and others. Look East later became the Act East Policy (see Regional Groupings).

Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2016 · GS Paper II · Q18 · 12.5 marks

Evaluate the economic and strategic dimensions of India’s Look East Policy in the context of the post Cold War international scenario.

Mains 2013: what is meant by Gujral doctrine? Does it have any relevance today? Mains 2013 It is the idea that India, as the largest country in South Asia, should offer goodwill to smaller neighbours without asking for equal return (non-reciprocity), respect their sovereignty and settle disputes peacefully. Relevance today: Neighbourhood First, credit lines and crisis help (for example to Sri Lanka in 2022) follow the same spirit, though security concerns now set limits.

Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2013 · GS Paper II · Q24 · 10 marks

What is meant by Gujral doctrine? Does it have any relevance today? Discuss.

Mains box: analysis and answer points

  • For: closer ties with the US, Quad and G7 outreach, and focus on national interest.
  • Against: India still speaks for the Global South (vaccine supplies abroad during Covid-19, demands for climate finance).
  • Better view: the image has changed form, from ideological leadership to a bridge between North and South.
  • Economic: trade and investment with ASEAN, free trade agreements, connectivity to the North-East.
  • Strategic: balancing China, maritime security in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea, defence ties with Vietnam, Japan and others.
  • Likely next angle: Image of leadership

Practice

Practice MCQs (8)

Q1 · Battle IAS practice

Consider the following statements about the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence in 1954:
1. The Prime Ministers of India and China issued a Joint Statement in New Delhi on 28 June 1954 reaffirming the principles and stating that they should apply in relations with other countries in Asia and elsewhere.
2. A day later, a similar Sino-Burmese Joint Statement was issued in Rangoon by Zhou Enlai and U Nu.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer (c) & explanation

After the April 1954 agreement, Nehru and Zhou Enlai issued the India-China Joint Statement in New Delhi on 28 June 1954, extending the principles beyond the Tibet trade context. On 29 June 1954, Zhou Enlai and U Nu issued a parallel statement in Rangoon. Both statements are correct.

Q2 · Battle IAS practice

Consider the following principles:
1. Mutual respect for each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty
2. Mutual non-aggression
3. Mutual non-interference in each other's internal affairs
4. Equality and mutual benefit
5. Peaceful co-existence
6. Collective defence under a great-power alliance
How many of the above form the original Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence (Panchsheel)?

Answer (c) & explanation

Panchsheel consists of exactly the first five principles listed above. 'Collective defence under a great-power alliance' is the opposite of the Bandung and NAM spirit and is not part of Panchsheel. So five of the six statements belong to the original set.

Q3 · Battle IAS practice

Speaking in Parliament, Jawaharlal Nehru welcomed the term 'Panchsheel' for the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence by linking it to which of the following?

Answer (c) & explanation

As the MEA's 2014 statement recalls, Nehru referred in Parliament to Lord Buddha's use of Panchsheel as a moral concept and welcomed it as a name for the Five Principles. In Myanmar too, Panchsheel has Buddhist roots. Kautilya's shadgunya is a realist doctrine of six policy options, the opposite tradition.

Q4 · Battle IAS practice

With reference to the 'phase two' of India's Look East policy, consider the following statements:
1. It was first outlined by Prime Minister I.K. Gujral in 1996.
2. It expanded the definition of 'East' to extend from Australia to China and East Asia, with ASEAN at its core.
3. It widened the agenda from trade and investment to security issues, including the protection of sea lanes and coordination on counter-terrorism.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

Answer (b) & explanation

Statement 1 is wrong: the idea of a second phase was set out by External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha in a speech at Harvard University in September 2003, as studies by ISAS (NUS) and others record; Gujral is associated instead with a doctrine for the neighbourhood. Statement 2 is correct: Sinha said phase two was characterised by an expanded definition of 'East', extending from Australia to China and East Asia, with ASEAN at its core. Statement 3 is correct: he described a shift from the first phase's focus on trade and investment to wider economic and security issues, including joint efforts to protect sea lanes and coordinate counter-terrorism. Phase two thus prepared the ground for the strategic content that the Act East policy formalised in 2014.

Q5 · Battle IAS practice

In his Ramnath Goenka Lecture of November 2019, the External Affairs Minister described the phase that began in 1991, when India's focus shifted to safeguarding strategic autonomy in a unipolar world. Which policy did he say 'summarized the changed Indian approach to world affairs' in that phase?

Answer (a) & explanation

Describing the fourth phase, the lecture of 14 November 2019 said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union the world became unipolar and India's focus shifted to safeguarding strategic autonomy, which included protecting its nuclear weapons option; it then said, 'The Look East policy summarized the changed Indian approach to world affairs, which also saw adjustments in its position on Israel', a reference to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992 alongside the economic reforms of 1991. The Gujral Doctrine of the mid-1990s was about generosity towards smaller neighbours, not a summary of India's whole approach; Panchsheel belongs to 1954; and Connect Central Asia was announced only in 2012.

Q6 · Battle IAS practice

Which United Nations General Assembly resolution of 1957 called upon all States to develop friendly and cooperative relations and settle disputes by peaceful means, reflecting the language of the Five Principles?

Answer (a) & explanation

Resolution 1236 (XII) of 14 December 1957, titled 'Peaceful and neighbourly relations among States', called on all States to strengthen peace and settle disputes peacefully, in language close to the Five Principles. 1514 (XV) is the 1960 Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples; 2758 seated the PRC; 377 (V) is Uniting for Peace.

Q7 · Battle IAS practice

With reference to the reception of Panchsheel in international forums, consider the following statements:
1. UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold described the Five Principles as a reaffirmation of the obligations and aims of the United Nations.
2. The Non-Aligned Movement accepted Panchsheel as among its core principles at the Belgrade Conference of 1961.
3. The Bandung Conference of 1955 reduced the Five Principles to three principles of peaceful co-existence.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

Answer (a) & explanation

The Vice President's 2014 statement records that Hammarskjold called the principles a reaffirmation of UN obligations and aims, and that NAM accepted Panchsheel as core principles at Belgrade (1961). Bandung expanded them to Ten Principles; it did not reduce them, so statement 3 is wrong.

Q8 · Battle IAS practice

'Nonalignment 2.0: A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century' (2012), often cited in debates on strategic autonomy, was

Answer (d) & explanation

Nonalignment 2.0 (2012) was written by a group of independent analysts and former officials, including Sunil Khilnani, Shyam Saran and Srinath Raghavan, and published by the Centre for Policy Research. It argued that India should retain strategic autonomy while engaging all major powers. It was not a government document.

0 / 0 correct

Write an answer

In 150 words, explain the significance of Basics of Indian Foreign Policy with one recent example.

Flashcards (12)

Article on international peace?

Article 51 (DPSP).

Article 51(d)?

Settle disputes by arbitration.

Article 253?

Laws to implement treaties.

Panchsheel signed?

29 April 1954.

Panchsheel first appeared in?

India-China Tibet trade agreement.

Bandung Conference?

April 1955, 29 Afro-Asian countries.

NAM took Panchsheel as core in?

Belgrade, 1961.

Non-alignment vs neutrality?

Not neutral; issue-based stands.

Look East aims?

Regional player; restore ties with SE/E Asia.

Look East became?

Act East Policy.

Gujral doctrine core?

Non-reciprocity to smaller neighbours.

1971 treaty?

Indo-Soviet treaty.

Read more: related explainers

In the news

Next topic · 1.2 →Basics of Indian Foreign Policy: From non-alignment to strategic autonomy

Syllabus: GS-II · India and its neighborhood- relations.

Read these notes on battleias.com