Subsidiary Alliance (1798): Wellesley’s Terms, the States that Signed, Effects, and Comparison with the Doctrine of Lapse (UPSC Notes + PYQs)

Updated 4 min read2 PYQs linked
Gates of Fort William in Kolkata
Asked by UPSCPrelims 2020, 20182 PYQs

UPSC has already asked about this. Read the story with these questions in mind.

Quick answerThe Subsidiary Alliance was Lord Wellesley’s (1798-1805) system for bringing Indian States under British control without annexing them. A ruler had to keep a British force in his territory and pay for it, accept a British Resident, and give up independent foreign relations. Hyderabad signed first, in 1798.

The terms

  • A British army stationed in the State, maintained by the ruler, often through ceding territory.
  • A British Resident at the court.
  • No alliances or wars without British consent.
  • No Europeans other than the British in service.
  • In return, the Company protected the ruler from enemies and from internal revolt.

Who signed, and how

StateYearNote
Hyderabad1798 (revised 1800)First; French-trained troops disbanded
Mysore1799Imposed on the restored Wodeyars after Tipu died at Seringapatam
Tanjore, Awadh1799, 1801Awadh ceded half its territory (Rohilkhand and the Doab)
Peshwa1802 (Treaty of Bassein)Led to the Second Anglo-Maratha War
Bhonsle, Scindia1803After defeats at Assaye, Laswari

Why it suited the Company, and what it did to the States

The Company got an army paid by Indian money, stationed at strategic points, while rulers carried the blame for misrule. Rulers lost the will to govern well because the British guaranteed their thrones; soldiers of disbanded armies lost livelihoods and turned to banditry (one root of the Pindari problem); heavy subsidies pushed States into debt, which later became a reason for annexation.

Subsidiary Alliance vs Doctrine of Lapse

Wellesley protected and controlled; Dalhousie (1848-56) annexed. Under the Doctrine of Lapse, a dependent State without a natural heir passed to the Company: Satara (1848), Jhansi and Nagpur (1854) and others. Awadh was annexed in 1856 on grounds of misgovernance. Both fed the anger of 1857.

Subsidiary Alliance: UPSC angle

For UPSC CSE

Prelims: which statement does not apply to the system (a 2018 question), order of States, Treaty of Bassein. Mains GS-I: methods of British expansion.

Subsidiary Alliance UPSC PYQs (Prelims)

Questions UPSC has actually asked, from the official papers. Pick an option to check yourself.

UPSC Prelims 2018 · GS-I · Q75

(Same table as the question above.)
With reference to the above table, the following assumptions have been made :
– 1. Nowadays, prosperity of an already high performing State cannot be sustained without making further large investments in its telecom infrastructure.
– 2. Nowadays, a very high Tele-density is the most essential condition for promoting the business and economic growth in a State.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?

Answer (d) & why

Under the Subsidiary Alliance (from 1798), an Indian ruler paid for a British force kept in his state, often by handing over territory. He could not employ other Europeans, which shut out the French under Napoleon, and he gave up his foreign relations. Raising a fixed income was not its purpose.

Answer as per the official UPSC key · Battle IAS PYQ bank

UPSC Prelims 2020 · GS-I · Q34

Wellesley established the Fort William College at Calcutta because

Answer (d) & why

Wellesley set up Fort William College in 1800 to train young Company civil servants in Indian languages, law and history. The Directors disliked the cost, and set up Haileybury in England in 1806. William Carey did teach there, but that was a result, not the reason.

Answer as per the official UPSC key · Battle IAS PYQ bank

Mains PYQs on this topic

No UPSC Mains question from 2023-2026 is directly on this topic. Older papers (2013-2022) will be added as the Mains bank grows.

Quick quiz

Practice · UPSC

The first Indian State to accept the Subsidiary Alliance was

Answer (c)

1798.

Practice · UPSC

The Treaty of Bassein (1802) was signed with

Answer (b)

Peshwa Baji Rao II.

Practice · UPSC

Satara and Jhansi were annexed under

Answer (b)

Dalhousie.

FAQs

Who introduced the Subsidiary Alliance?

Lord Wellesley, Governor-General 1798-1805, building on earlier practice by Dupleix and Clive.

Did the system annex States directly?

No. It controlled them indirectly, but debts and cessions often prepared later annexation.

Which ruler refused the alliance and fought?

Tipu Sultan, killed in 1799; Holkar resisted until 1805.

How is it different from the Doctrine of Lapse?

The first kept rulers as dependants; the second annexed States lacking natural heirs.

Spotted an error? Tell us. We correct within 48 hours.

Image: Pinakpani, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

How to use this in Mains

GS-I

If asked: How did the Subsidiary Alliance help the British expand their control in India? (GS-I)

Quote: “The Company got an army paid by Indian money, stationed at strategic points, while rulers carried the blame for misrule.”

Use it: Perfect one-line analysis for your body.

In the news

GS1 · Modern India / Personalities

Birth anniversaries: Jayaprakash Narayan and Nanaji Deshmukh

11 October is the birth anniversary of Loknayak Jayaprakash Narayan and Nanaji Deshmukh, both Bharat Ratna awardees. The Prime Minister recalled JP's voice during the Emergency and his concern for good governance, and Nanaji's work in rural development and community participation. Treat this as a personality note for Prelims.

11 Oct 2026
GS1 · History and culture

ASI and Denmark museum to search for 1619 Danish shipwreck Oresund off Karaikal

The Archaeological Survey of India's Underwater Archaeology Wing and the National Museum of Denmark (Njord Centre, Copenhagen) signed an MoU to locate and document the Danish ship Oresund, wrecked off Karaikal, Puducherry, in 1619 CE. It is described as the first Danish ship known to have reached India.

15 Jun 2026