UPSC Mains 2025 · GS Paper II · Q7

UPSC Mains 2025 GS2 Q7: model answer

e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine.

10 marks150 wordsDirective: Examine

What the question wants

Test the claim with examples; show where it holds and where it does not; suggest a user-first approach.

How to structure it

Intro: E-governance is meant to make services easier for citizens. Body: (1) Where the bias shows; (2) Counter-evidence; (3) Way forward. Conclusion: design principles.

How to structure the answer
IntroductionE-governance is meant to make services easier for citizens
Body: examine
  1. 1(1) Where the bias shows
  2. 2(2) Counter-evidence
  3. 3(3)
ConclusionConclusion: design principles

Model answer

E-governance is meant to make services easier for citizens. Many projects, however, are planned from the department's side: databases, integration and dashboards first, the user later.

Where the bias shows

  • Aadhaar-based biometric authentication in ration shops excluded people whose fingerprints failed, with no simple offline fallback.
  • English-first portals and complex forms in a country where NFHS-5 found only 33% of women had ever used the internet.
  • Success measured by transactions and seeding numbers, not by whether grievances were solved.
  • Assisted access points are thin; citizens still pay middlemen at cyber cafés.

Counter-evidence

  • UPI succeeded because it was simple for users.
  • DigiLocker, UMANG and CoWIN had multilingual, mobile-first designs.
  • Common Service Centres provide human help.

Way forward: design with users, offline options, local languages, usability testing and grievance redress built in, in line with the 'citizen first' spirit of the e-Kranti principles.

Technology is the means; ease for the last citizen is the measure.

Keywords, cases and data to drop in

user-centric design digital divide assisted access CSCs exclusion errors

Where most answers lose marks

  • Writing a generic list of e-governance schemes.

Fresh examples from current affairs

GS2/GS3 · Consumer protection · Internal security

CCPA acts against online sale of explosives: 3,940 sellers delisted from seven platforms

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) said on 19 October 2026 that 3,940 sellers of regulated explosives such as ammonium nitrate, picric acid and PETN have been delisted from seven online platforms after its action. It has fined Dial4Trade and ExportersIndia ₹10 lakh per order, and other cases are under hearing or investigation.

UPSC angle: Prelims: CCPA, PESO, CPA 2019 sections, helpline 1915. · Mains GS-II/III: platform liability and security.

19 Oct 2026
GS2/GS3 · Consumer protection · Trade

India to host 61st CIML meeting on legal metrology in New Delhi, 26–28 October

India will host the 61st meeting of the International Committee of Legal Metrology (CIML) for the first time, in New Delhi from 26 to 28 October 2026. The Department of Consumer Affairs is organising it with the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML), and more than 100 delegates are expected, PIB said on 19 October.

UPSC angle: Prelims: OIML, CIML, Legal Metrology Act 2009, Union List Entry 50. · Mains GS-III: standards and trade.

19 Oct 2026
GS2 · Health · Education

NMC withdraws MSMER-2023: medical colleges lose the fixed penalty rulebook, annual disclosure stays

The National Medical Commission (NMC) has de-notified the Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (MSMER-2023) by a notification dated 14 October 2026, published in the Gazette on 16 October. Its fixed penalties, including seat cuts and fines of up to ₹5 lakh for false records, go with it. The Annual Disclosure Report stays.

UPSC angle: Prelims: NMC Act 2019, autonomous boards, Concurrent List Entry 25. · Mains GS-II: regulation of medical education.

19 Oct 2026
GS2 · Polity · Probity

Supreme Court: no prior approval under Section 17A needed to probe a bribe demand

In a judgment of 16 October 2026, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria held that investigating a bribe demand by a public servant does not need prior approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Asking for a bribe, the court said, is not part of discharging official duties.

UPSC angle: Prelims: Sections 7, 7A, 17A and 19 of the PC Act. · Mains GS-II/GS-IV: honest officers versus accountability.

19 Oct 2026

Learn the concept

Question text as printed in the official UPSC question paper: https://www.upsc.gov.in/sites/default/files/GENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-II-QP-CSM-25-010925.pdf The model answer is original Battle IAS work; use it to learn structure, not to memorise.