Free daily practice · Prelims and Mains

Daily Current Affairs Quiz 8 November 2026

Daily Current Affairs Quiz · Free

Join today’s leaderboard

Name only. No login, no mobile number.

How it works
  • 20 questions from 8 November’s current affairs, 20 minutes.
  • Test timer counts down and submits at zero; a clock on each question shows your time.
  • +2 for right, −0.67 for wrong; blanks carry no penalty.
  • Answers, explanations and your time per question appear after you submit.
  • Your first attempt today is ranked (ties go to less time); later attempts are practice.
  • Free, no login. Mains practice with model answers is below.
  1. Mon2Nov
  2. Tue3Nov
  3. Wed4Nov
  4. Thu5Nov
  5. Fri6Nov
  6. Sat7Nov
  7. Sun8Nov
Calendar
November 2026
MTWTFSS123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
All daily quizzes →

Mains practice

2 questions · write first, then compare

GS-315 marks250 words

Q1. Ten years after demonetisation, currency with the public as a share of Gross Domestic Product is back above its 2016 level even as digital payments have grown sharply. Critically examine the outcomes of demonetisation against its stated objectives.

Show model answerHide model answer

Introduction: On 8 November 2016, ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes, about 86% of the currency by value, ceased to be legal tender. The stated aims were to curb black money, counterfeit currency and terror funding, and to push a less-cash economy.

Outcomes against objectives: (1) Cash: currency with the public was 11.9% of Gross Domestic Product in 2015-16 and is 12.1% in 2025-26, so the economy has not become less cash-dependent. (2) Digital payments: Unified Payments Interface transactions grew from almost nothing to nearly 91% of Gross Domestic Product in value by 2025-26, a lasting change helped by cheap data and the India Stack. (3) Counterfeits: fake notes detected per crore notes fell from 70.1 to 13.4, but detection of fake ₹500 notes, and earlier of ₹2,000 notes, rose. (4) Black money: almost all demonetised notes returned to the banking system, suggesting black money was held mostly in other assets. (5) Costs: short-term disruption to the informal sector, small businesses and farm trade.

Lessons: a one-time cash withdrawal cannot fix structural problems; tax compliance, data-driven enforcement, property and political funding reforms, and steady digital adoption work better.

Conclusion: Demonetisation accelerated digital payments and formalisation, but its core aims of reducing cash and black money were not met; durable reforms rather than shocks deliver these goals.

Battle IAS model answer

Read the article: Ten years after note ban, cash use has not fallen →

GS-215 marks250 words

Q2. The Karnataka High Court has held that the Enforcement Directorate's power is 'derivative and not original' and that it is not a 'super cop'. Discuss the need to balance the powers of investigative agencies with personal liberty and the separation of powers.

Show model answerHide model answer

Introduction: The Enforcement Directorate probes money laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, which depends on a scheduled (predicate) offence. When it found signs of a job scam in a milk union and the police did not act, it filed its own private complaint; the High Court quashed it, holding that under Section 66(2) the agency must only share information with the proper agency.

Why limits matter: (1) Separation of powers and checks and balances: each agency acts within the field the law gives it. (2) Personal liberty under Article 21: the Act's strict bail conditions and wide powers of search and arrest make overreach costly for citizens. (3) Federal balance: policing and public order are State subjects; an agency starting probes on its own can bypass State police. (4) Low conviction rates compared with the number of cases raise concerns of misuse.

Why strong agencies are still needed: money laundering is complex and cross-border; the Financial Action Task Force expects effective enforcement; the Supreme Court upheld most provisions of the Act in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (2022).

Way forward: clear statutory limits; time-bound probes; independent oversight; better coordination with State police through information sharing rather than parallel cases; safeguards on arrest and bail; transparency on case outcomes.

Conclusion: The ruling keeps a powerful agency within its legal field; strong but accountable agencies serve both justice and liberty.

Battle IAS model answer

Read the article: Enforcement Directorate is not a ‘super cop’: High Court →

Read the stories behind this quiz