Chapter 20 · Topic 20.2 · Prelims + Mains2 of 4

Non Constitutional Bodies: NHRC, CBI and CVC

Key points

  • NHRC: a statutory body under the 1993 Act; the chair is a former CJI or Supreme Court judge; the term is three years or age 70.
  • CBI: set up by a 1963 resolution, with powers from the DSPE Act, 1946; it needs a State's consent (Section 6), but courts can order probes.
  • CVC: set up in 1964 (Santhanam Committee) and statutory since 2003; it is chosen by the PM, Home Minister and Leader of the Opposition; term four years or 65; it supervises the CBI only in corruption cases.

Prelims box: facts and traps

ItemNHRC
LawProtection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (amended 2006, 2019)
ChairA former Chief Justice of India or a former Supreme Court judge
Appointed byPresident, on a committee of the PM, Lok Sabha Speaker, Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman, Leaders of the Opposition in both Houses and the Home Minister
Removed byPresident
TermThree years or 70
  • Trap: the CBI is not a statutory body. It was set up by a 1963 Home Ministry resolution and draws its powers from the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.
  • Trap (Prelims 2026): only the CBI row was right. The Central Economic Intelligence Bureau is under the Finance Ministry, not Home, and the SFIO is under Corporate Affairs, not Finance.
  • Trap: State consent is not the final word. Constitutional courts can order a CBI probe without it (West Bengal v CPDR, 2010), and in July 2024 the Supreme Court held West Bengal's Art 131 suit maintainable.
  • Trap: SHRC members are removed by the President, not the Governor.

Human Rights Commissions

Quick answerThe National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is India’s watchdog for human rights. It steps in if police torture someone in custody. States can have their own State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs).

The NHRC is a statutory body, which means a law passed by Parliament created it, not the Constitution. It is also quasi-judicial: it works like a court and can call witnesses, but it can only recommend action, never punish.

ItemNHRCState HRC
LawProtection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (amended 2006, 2019)Same Act
ChairA former Chief Justice of India or a former Supreme Court judgeA former Chief Justice or judge of a High Court
MembersFive members (at least one woman), plus heads of seven national commissionsSimilar, at State level
Appointed byPresident, on a committee of the PM, Lok Sabha Speaker, Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman, Leaders of the Opposition in both Houses and the Home MinisterGovernor, on a committee headed by the Chief Minister
Removed byPresidentPresident (not the Governor)
TermThree years or 70, can be reappointed (2019)Three years or 70

What the NHRC can do, and what it can’t

  • Powers: inquire into violations, on a complaint or on its own, with a civil court’s powers; visit jails; review laws and safeguards; recommend compensation or prosecution.
  • Limits: it can’t look into matters more than one year old; its recommendations don’t bind the government; for the armed forces it can only seek a report from the Union.

Like a doctor who writes a prescription but can’t make you take it.

Mains 2021 (below): two kinds of limits.

  • Structural: retired judges and officials; the one-year limit; no power over the armed forces; dependence on government staff and funds.
  • Practical: backlogs, vacancies, advice ignored.

Mains 2014 asked about the NHRC as a complement to the judiciary; Mains 2018 about one umbrella commission. A merger saves duplication but may lose focus on SCs, women and children.

Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2021 · GS Paper II · Q12 · 15 marks

Though the Human Rights Commissions have contributed immensely to the protection of human rights in India, yet they have failed to assert themselves against the mighty and powerful. Analyzing their structural and practical limitations, suggest remedial measures.

Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2014 · GS Paper II · Q9 · 12.5 marks

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India can be most effective when its tasks are adequately supported by other mechanisms that ensure the accountability of a government. In light of the above observation, assess the role of NHRC as an effective complement to the judiciary and other institutions in promoting and protecting human rights standards.

Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2018 · GS Paper II · Q16 · 15 marks

Multiplicity of various commissions for the vulnerable sections of the society leads to problems of overlapping jurisdiction and duplication of functions. Is it better to merge all commissions into an umbrella Human Rights Commission? Argue your case.

What UPSC asks: Prelims: the chair, the selection committee, and who removes SHRC members (the President).

CBI and the Central Vigilance Commission

Quick answerThe CBI is India’s main investigating agency. It’s not statutory: a 1963 Home Ministry resolution set it up, and its powers come from the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (DSPE Act). The CVC, the Union’s anti-corruption watchdog, is statutory since 2003.

The CBI works under the Department of Personnel and Training, and its stated mission is: To preserve values in public life and ensure the health of the national economy. In Prelims 2026 that row was correct; the CEIB sits with Finance and the SFIO with Corporate Affairs, so only one row matched (option a, provisional key).

Asked by UPSCUPSC Prelims 2026 · GS Paper I · Q63

With reference to the organisations under the Government of India, consider the following details :
Sl. No. – Organisation – Function – Controlling Union Ministry
1. Central Economic Intelligence Bureau (CEIB) – To coordinate between various law enforcement agencies – Ministry of Home Affairs
2. Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) – To investigate complex corporate frauds – Ministry of Finance
3. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) – To preserve values in public life and ensure the health of the national economy – Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension
In how many of the above rows are the given details correctly matched ?

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. None
Show answer

Answer: (a) · UPSC provisional key (final key awaited)

Why does the CBI need a State’s consent?

Police is a State subject, so under Section 6 of the DSPE Act the CBI needs the State’s consent, like a guest needing the host’s permission. Several States have withdrawn it.

  • Mains 2021: the power to refuse is not absolute. Constitutional courts can order a CBI probe without consent (State of West Bengal v Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, 2010).
  • In some cases against Union employees, consent isn’t needed.
  • In July 2024 the Supreme Court held West Bengal’s suit against the Union over CBI cases maintainable under Art 131.
Asked by UPSCUPSC Mains 2021 · GS Paper II · Q11 · 15 marks

The jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding lodging an FIR and conducting probe within a particular State is being questioned by various States. However, the power of the States to withhold consent to the CBI is not absolute. Explain with special reference to the federal character of India.

ItemCBI DirectorCentral Vigilance Commission
BasisDSPE Act (as amended by the Lokpal Act, 2013)Set up in 1964 (Santhanam Committee); statutory under the CVC Act, 2003
Who sits in itOne DirectorOne Central Vigilance Commissioner and up to two Vigilance Commissioners
SelectionPM, Leader of the Opposition, Chief Justice of India or a judge nominated by himPM, Home Minister, Leader of the Opposition
TermTwo years, extendable year by year up to fiveFour years or 65
LinkCVC supervises the CBI in Prevention of Corruption Act cases (Vineet Narain, 1997)Advisory on vigilance in Union ministries; no power to prosecute

Exam trap: the CBI investigates; the CVC supervises it only in Prevention of Corruption Act cases.

What UPSC asks: Prelims: controlling ministries (2026) and selection committees. Mains: State consent and federalism (2021). Next: withdrawal of consent, the Art 131 suit.

Mains box: analysis and answer points

  • Powers: inquire into violations on a complaint or on its own, with a civil court's powers; visit jails; review laws; recommend compensation or prosecution.
  • Limits: nothing older than one year; recommendations don't bind; for the armed forces it can only seek a report from the Union.
  • Mains 2021 (GS II, 15 marks): why do the Commissions fail against the mighty? Give structural limits (retired judges, the one-year rule, dependence on government) and practical ones (backlogs, vacancies, advice ignored), then remedies.
  • Next likely angle: the 2019 amendments, covering the term and who can be chair.

Practice

Practice MCQs (8)

Q1 · Battle IAS practice

Consider the following statements:
1. The National Human Rights Commission is a constitutional body.
2. The Chairperson of the NHRC is appointed by the Chief Justice of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer (d) & explanation

Neither statement is correct. The NHRC is a statutory body created by the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; the Constitution does not mention it. Under section 4, its Chairperson and Members are appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal, on the recommendation of a committee of the Prime Minister (chair), the Speaker, the Union Home Minister, the Leaders of the Opposition in both Houses and the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The CJI is consulted only before a sitting judge is appointed.

Q2 · Battle IAS practice

Under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, which one of the following lies outside the powers of the NHRC, that is, it can NOT do?

Answer (a) & explanation

Section 12 of the PHRA lists the NHRC's functions: it may visit jails and other institutions to study living conditions, review constitutional and legal safeguards, spread human rights literacy, inquire into complaints and intervene in court proceedings. It is not a criminal court: it cannot try or punish anyone. Under section 18 it can recommend compensation, prosecution or other action, or approach the Supreme Court or a High Court; a 2021 Madras High Court Full Bench even held such recommendations binding, but trial and punishment still belong to the courts.

Q3 · Battle IAS practice

Consider the following statements:
1. The NHRC may intervene in any court proceeding involving an allegation of violation of human rights, with the approval of that court.
2. While inquiring into complaints, the NHRC has the powers of a civil court trying a suit.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer (c) & explanation

Both statements are correct. Section 12(b) of the PHRA lets the Commission intervene in any proceeding involving an allegation of human rights violation pending before a court, with the approval of that court. Section 13 gives it, while inquiring into complaints, the powers of a civil court trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: summoning and examining witnesses on oath, discovery and production of documents, receiving evidence on affidavits and requisitioning public records. These are investigative tools; they do not make it a court that decides the case.

Q4 · Battle IAS practice

With reference to the National Human Rights Commission, consider the following statements:
1. Only a retired Chief Justice of India can be appointed its Chairperson.
2. Its Chairperson and members hold office for three years or until the age of seventy years, whichever is earlier.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer (b) & explanation

Only statement 2 is correct. The Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019 cut the term of the Chairperson and members from five years to three years or until age seventy, whichever is earlier, and made the Chairperson eligible for reappointment. Statement 1 is wrong: the same amendment changed section 3(2)(a), so the Chairperson can now be a person who has been the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court; before 2019 only a former Chief Justice of India could be appointed.

Q5 · Battle IAS practice

Consider the following:
1. Chairperson of the National Commission for Women
2. Chairperson of the National Commission for Minorities
3. Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
4. Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission
How many of the above are deemed members of the National Human Rights Commission for the discharge of certain functions?

Answer (b) & explanation

Two of the four are deemed members. Section 3(3) of the PHRA makes the chairpersons of the National Commission for Women and the National Commission for Minorities deemed members for the functions in section 12(b) to (j), along with the chairpersons of the National Commissions for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes and Protection of Child Rights and the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (the last three added in 2019). The CAG and the UPSC Chairman head constitutional bodies with no rights-protection role.

Q6 · Battle IAS practice

Under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, a Court of Session is specified as a Human Rights Court in each district by

Answer (b) & explanation

Under section 30 of the PHRA, for the speedy trial of offences arising out of human rights violations, the State Government may, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification specify a Court of Session in each district as a Human Rights Court; this does not apply where a special court already exists for such offences. Under section 31 the State Government also specifies or appoints a Special Public Prosecutor for each such court. The Union and the NHRC play no part in designation.

Q7 · Battle IAS practice

Consider the following statements:
1. The Chairperson of a State Human Rights Commission is appointed by the President.
2. The NHRC inquires into complaints against the armed forces in the same way as complaints against any other public servant.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Answer (d) & explanation

Neither statement is correct. Under section 22 of the PHRA, the Chairperson and Members of a State Human Rights Commission are appointed by the Governor, on the recommendation of a committee headed by the Chief Minister, though removal is by the President. For the armed forces, section 19 lays down a special procedure: the NHRC may, on its own or on a petition, only seek a report from the Central Government, and then either drop the complaint or make recommendations; the government must inform it of the action taken within three months.

Q8 · Battle IAS practice

After the 2019 amendment to the Protection of Human Rights Act, who can be appointed Chairperson of a State Human Rights Commission?

Answer (c) & explanation

After the 2019 amendment to the PHRA, section 21(2)(a) says the Chairperson of a State Human Rights Commission shall be a person who has been a Chief Justice or a Judge of a High Court; before 2019 only a former Chief Justice of a High Court was eligible. The Chairperson and Members are appointed by the Governor on the advice of a committee headed by the Chief Minister, but they can be removed only by the President. A Supreme Court background and a civil-servant chair are not the SHRC rule.

0 / 0 correct

Write an answer

In 150 words, explain the significance of Non Constitutional Bodies with one recent example.

Flashcards (7)

Who can chair the NHRC?

A former CJI or a former Supreme Court judge.

Time limit for NHRC inquiries?

Matters within one year of the incident.

Which Act gives the CBI its powers?

The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.

Which section requires State consent for

CBI probes? Section 6 of the DSPE Act.

Who selects the CBI Director?

PM, Leader of the Opposition, and the CJI or his nominee.

Which committee recommended the CVC?

The Santhanam Committee (1964).

Which case gave the CVC supervision over

the CBI? Vineet Narain (1997).

Read more: related explainers

In the news

Next topic · 20.3 →Non Constitutional Bodies: Lokpal, Lokayuktas and Information Commissions

Syllabus: GS-II · Statutory, regulatory and various quasi-judicial bodies.

Read these notes on battleias.com